October 2018
POCLAD Article
Rethinking the Constitution, Rethinking Democracy
by the POCLAD
The nomination and confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court has once again fueled long-suppressed public discussion about the intended and current role of the U.S. Constitution in promoting authentic democracy1 in our nation.
Public fallout from Kavanaugh’s confirmation is similar to the reaction following two presidential elections within the last 18 years in which the candidate with the most popular votes lost the election due to the workings of the Electoral College. In addition, two recent Supreme Court decisions permitted more money from the rich and corporations to flood into elections2 and allowed states with histories of discriminatory voting practices exemption from federal pre-approval of new voting laws3. These decisions raise a fundamental question: is the U.S. Constitution and the branch of government that interprets it – the Supreme Court -- fair, just and responsive in protecting the rights of a minority, as well as the rights of the majority against an economically and politically powerful minority?
Is the U.S. Constitution and the branch of government that interprets it – the Supreme Court – fair, just and responsive in protecting the rights of a minority, as well as the rights of the majority against an economically and politically powerful minority?
- The Kavanaugh confirmation process raises profound questions about the:
- - selection and confirmation of Supreme Court justices,
- - power and authority of the Supreme Court in relation to the other branches of government,
- - differences (or not) between the white, men of property of the current Senate dominating decision-making compared to the white, men of property at our nation’s founding who dominated the Constitutional Convention and alone occupied the Supreme Court for most of our nation's history.
- The democratic disconnect between the vote of the Senate to confirm Kavanaugh and the will of the public against confirmation (but without public input!) based on his views and judicial record has given rise to rethinking the:
- - U.S. Constitution itself as a static vs a living document that acknowledges changing realities among people, communities and all living things,
- - other profoundly undemocratic sections of the Constitution requiring democratic alternatives aspired to by self-governing people.
POCLAD has grappled with these issues for more than two decades. We've examined these concerns in talks, workshops, articles and letters. We believe much of our work, especially the articles printed in our By What Authority newsletter, speak timelessly to the challenges inherent in the structures, laws and institutions that affirm and expand corporate rule, oligarchy, patriarchy, and other systems of oppression.
The constitution is not the 10 Commandments and the "founders" were not like Moses who came down from a mountain top with a stone tablet etched for all time.
It’s long past time to rethink the Constitution...with democracy in mind.
We offer below a number of our "timeless" resources on the Constitution and democracy to read and reflect upon. Feel free to gather a few people together to discuss, deliberate and maybe even debate these readings. Let us know of any interesting outcomes or insights.
Rethinking long unquestioned assumptions and narratives is an essential first step in challenging those assumptions and narratives.
<><><>
Challenging Empire's Story: Control Through Storytelling
by the POCLAD
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2002/BWA_2002_MAR.html
Our Corporate Elite and the Constitution
by Richard Grossman and Ward Morehouse
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2002/BWA_2002_JUN.html#2
HELP! I’VE BEEN COLONIZED AND CAN’T GET UP…Take a Lawyer and an Expert To a Hearing and Call Me In a Decade
by Jane Anne Morris
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2005/BWA_2005_FEB.html
Toward a New Labor Theory
by Peter Kellman
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2007/BWA_2007_FALL.html#2
The Case Against Judicial Review: Building a strong basis for our legal system
by David Cobb
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2007/BWA_2007_FALL.html
The U. S. Constitution: Pull the Curtain: One of a series of two articles on the U.S. Constitution
by Greg Coleridge and Virginia Rasmussen
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2007/BWA_2007_DEC.html
A U.S. Constitution with DEMOCRACY IN MIND
by Virginia Rasmussen and Greg Coleridge
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2007/BWA_2007_MAR.html#3
Why Abolish All Corporate Constitutional Rights
by the POCLAD
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2010/BWA_2010_NOV.html
Supreme Authority: The Growing Power of the US Supreme Court and Democratic Alternatives
by Greg Coleridge
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2014/BWA_2014_Oct.html
Are Not Corporations People, Too?… Encounters with Corporate Liberals
by James Price
http://www.poclad.org/BWA/2017/BWA_2017_May.html
Defying Corporations, Defining Democracy: A Book of History & Strategy
Edited by Dean Ritz
https://rowman.com/isbn/9781891843105
- - - - - -
Notes
1 You may prefer the terms "self-rule," "self-governance," "self-determination," "sovereignty, or "right to decide."
2 Citizens United v FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010)
3 Shelby County vs Holder, 570 U.S. 2 (2013)
Subscribe to our new free REAL Democracy History Calendar. Details at http://poclad.org/real-democracy-calendar.html
Make a donation to POCLAD. Funds are needed for speaking, conferences, research, and minimal organizational maintenance. Contribute online at http://poclad.org/donate.html or by sending it to POCLAD, P.O. Box 18465, Cleveland Heights, Ohio 44118. For a tax deduction, send your check of $50 or more -- earmarked for "POCLAD"-- to the Jane Addams Peace Association, 777 United Nations Plaza, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10017. Thank you!